A lone hiker walks along a rugged mountain path at sunrise on Madeira Island.

The safest countries for solo female travellers, and what the rankings actually measure

The indices everyone quotes measure women's status in a country, not a visitor's safety. What they do measure, and ten places that genuinely work.

Mara Vance · Updated 2 Sep 2026 · 6 min read

Photo · Hikerwise · Pexels

Every list answering this question cites the same two indices, and neither of them was built to answer it.

That is not a reason to ignore them. It is a reason to know what they measure, because the gap between what they measure and what you are asking is where the useful information lives.

The ten that genuinely work

Ranked by what actually makes solo travel comfortable rather than by an index position: low violent crime, transport that runs late, a culture where a woman alone is unremarkable, and infrastructure dense enough that help is close.

1. Iceland

Top of the Global Peace Index since 2008, tiny population, effectively no violent crime, and a culture in which women travelling alone attracts no comment.

The real risks here are environmental: weather that turns in an hour, single-track roads, and rivers you should not ford. More solo travellers get into trouble in Iceland through the landscape than through anything else.

2. Denmark, Norway, Finland and Sweden

The Nordic block, and they top the WPS Index for reasons that do translate to visitors: excellent public transport that runs late, high trust, English spoken universally, and legal and social norms that back women up.

The catch is money and daylight. They are among the most expensive countries in Europe, and in December it is dark by three in the afternoon.

3. Japan

The standout non-European answer, and the one people are most surprised by.

Violent crime is very low, the transport is punctual and runs late, lost property genuinely gets handed in, and a woman walking alone at eleven at night in a Japanese city is unremarkable.

The honest exception: chikan, groping on crowded rush-hour trains, is a known and real problem, and women-only carriages exist because of it. They are at the front of most trains in the morning peak and using them is entirely normal.

Japan is also unusually easy to travel in alone because eating alone is completely normal there, which sounds trivial and is the thing solo travellers most often name. First time in Japan has the practical layer.

4. New Zealand

Small, sparse, outdoors-oriented and with a well-developed solo travel culture, particularly around hiking and the hostel network. English-speaking, which removes a whole layer of friction.

The catch: the same as Iceland. The environment is the risk, and the Great Walks are serious.

5. Slovenia

The one that tops the perception-based indices and almost nobody names. Compact, green, extremely safe, cheap by western European standards, and Ljubljana is small enough to cross on foot in twenty minutes.

It is on our underrated list for other reasons and it belongs on this one too.

6. Switzerland

Expensive and superb. The public transport is the best in the world by a distance, which matters enormously travelling alone: you are never dependent on a taxi, a lift or a last bus.

7. Singapore

Very low crime, excellent transport, English widely spoken, and comfortable to move around at any hour. Compact enough to be a genuinely easy first solo trip in Asia.

8. Portugal

The best-value entry on this list. Safe, warm, walkable cities, an established solo and remote-working scene, and a language barrier that is soft because English is widespread in Lisbon and Porto.

Lisbon or Porto covers the choice, and the honest note for solo travellers is that Lisbon's hills and its closed funiculars make late-night walks home harder than the map suggests.

What a ranking cannot tell you

The three things that most change a solo trip are all below national level, which is why an index cannot carry them.

The neighbourhood. Every large city has areas that are fine and areas that are not, and the difference is often two streets. That is the entire argument of our Mexico City guide, which answers the safety question by neighbourhood and by hour rather than by country.

The hour. A district that is excellent at two in the afternoon can empty by eight, which is a change of character rather than a change of danger, and it is the thing most visitors get caught by.

The transport. Whether the metro runs past midnight, whether ride-hailing works, and whether hailing a street taxi is normal or a bad idea, vary hugely between countries with similar index scores.

The practical layer, which travels everywhere

Book the first night before you land. Arriving somewhere new, alone, tired, without a bed, at night, is the single most avoidable bad situation in solo travel.

Arrive in daylight. Applies to every city, every time, and it is worth paying more for the flight.

Use apps rather than street taxis in any city where that is the local advice. Named driver, tracked route, no negotiation.

Have a plan for the phone. A local eSIM before you land, a power bank, and your accommodation address written down somewhere that is not the phone.

Tell somebody the shape of the day. Not a full itinerary. Which city, which accommodation, roughly when you expect to be back on wifi.

Eat somewhere with other people in it. The oldest rule and still the best, for food safety and for company.

Trust the feeling and leave. You do not owe anybody an explanation, a completed conversation or a finished drink.

What to skip

Choosing a destination from an index score alone. It is the wrong instrument for the question.

Ruling out a country because it ranks low. Mexico, Morocco and Vietnam are all travelled solo by women constantly. What makes those trips work is neighbourhood-level knowledge, not a national average, and the countries with the richest solo-travel information are frequently the ones with the middling scores.

"Dress like a local" as safety advice. Dress appropriately for the culture, which is respect and is worth doing. It is not a security measure and framing it as one puts the responsibility in the wrong place.

A first solo trip somewhere hard. Build the confidence somewhere easy. Portugal, Japan and Slovenia all exist.

Assuming the safest country is the best trip. Iceland is the safest place on this page and it is also expensive, dark half the year and largely empty. Safety is a constraint to satisfy, not a destination to optimise.

Before you book

Is Mexico City safe is the model for how we think this question should be answered: by neighbourhood, by hour, and including the risks that are not crime. Underrated European cities has several of the destinations above with more on what to actually do in them, and first time in Japan covers the practical layer for the non-European answer most people find surprising. If you are at the start of the planning rather than the destination choice, how to plan a family trip sets out the order to make decisions in, and most of it applies to travelling alone. For timing, the when to go hub and where to travel in October cover the months. More in the best of hub, and our entry-rules tool checks the paperwork against your own passport.

Index positions read September 2026 from the Georgetown Institute's WPS Index and the Global Peace Index, whose own published methodologies are the source for the limitations described above. Both are updated annually and both lag current events, which is the reason this page spends more time on the practical layer than on the table. Here is how we research and re-check guides.

Questions

What is the safest country for a solo female traveller?

On the published indices, Denmark and Iceland. Denmark scores highest overall on the Women, Peace and Security Index and Iceland has topped the Global Peace Index every year since 2008. The honest caveat is that neither index was built to answer this question, and both measure the lives of resident women rather than the experience of a visitor.

Are the solo female travel safety rankings reliable?

They are reliable measures of something adjacent. The WPS Index tracks women's inclusion, legal status and community security within a country; the Global Peace Index tracks national peacefulness. Both are serious pieces of work and neither measures street harassment, transport safety at night or how a foreign woman is treated, which is what the question is really about.

Is Japan safe for solo female travellers?

Unusually so, and it is the standout non-European answer. It sits high on the peace rankings, violent crime is very low, the transport runs late and reliably, and a woman walking alone at eleven at night in a Japanese city is unremarkable. Groping on crowded rush-hour trains is the known problem, which is why women-only carriages exist.

Where should a first solo trip be?

Somewhere with good public transport, a language you can partly navigate or that is widely translated, and a dense enough tourist infrastructure that being alone is normal. Portugal, Japan, Slovenia and New Zealand all qualify. The first solo trip is about building confidence, not about proving a point.

Does a low ranking mean you should not go?

No, and treating it that way would rule out most of the world. Mexico City, Morocco and Vietnam are all travelled solo by women constantly, with specific local knowledge rather than a national score. What changes the outcome is neighbourhood-level and hour-level information, which is what a ranking cannot give you.

Read next

More from here